top of page

The Same Fight, Every Time: What's Actually Repeating in Your Relationship

  • Writer: Dr. Maura Ferguson
    Dr. Maura Ferguson
  • 2 days ago
  • 4 min read

Most couples who come to see me are not fighting about what they think they're fighting about.


Couples often find that they either repeat the same fight with the same content with the same issue remaining painfully unresolved, others find that the content of disagreements change but that the pattern, the feel are the same with the same beats, the same rhythm as other fights. Both are disconcerting. It becomes like a recurring bad dream you want desperately to break out of. One week it's the dishes, something said in front of the in-laws. Another week it's money, or a missed text. The couple will often name these as separate incidents — unrelated, situational, provoked by circumstance. And on the surface, they are. But if you sit with a couple long enough, a shape starts to repeat underneath the content. The arguments are structurally the same argument. The particulars rotate; the choreography remains.

This is not only a communication problem, though it usually gets treated as one.


Couple sits on a bench with a dog by the water, facing the Golden Gate Bridge in warm hazy sunlight. They are not talking to each other and one is looking away from the other.


Communication is often thought of as strictly happening on a verbal level but so much is communicated in what we do, in what we don’t say, in our body language and our facial expressions. Verbal communication skills — the "I statements," the timeout, the active listening script — assume that the couple is having trouble getting their message across. Sometimes that's true. More often, the signal is getting through just fine, and what's repeating much older even than the relationship itself. Each partner is not simply responding to the other; each is also responding to something the other's behaviour has come to represent. The withdrawal reads as the abandonment from years earlier. The criticism reads as the impossible parent who was never satisfied. Neither partner is inventing this — they are pattern-matching, mostly outside awareness, and the current relationship becomes the stage on which an old scene gets reenacted.


A great deal has happened under the umbrella of psychoanalytic thought in the last century but if we go back to the OG: Freud, we find a name for this: repetition compulsion. The idea, roughly, is that what cannot be remembered gets repeated instead. Not because the person wants to suffer, but because repetition is a kind of communication when language fails — an attempt to finally get a different outcome from an old, unresolved situation, using whoever happens to be standing nearest. Partners are unusually good candidates for this. They are close enough, dependent enough, and provocative enough (in the ordinary sense of provoking real feeling) to pull old material into the present.


This is part of why skills-based interventions can improve things for a while and then quietly stop working. They can’t stick because they are tacked on in way that is unable to counter our deeply entrenched patterns. The couple gets better at de-escalating the fight in front of them. But the fight in front of them was never really the fight. Six months later, a new version surfaces — same shape, different subject — and the couple experiences this as a failure of the techniques, or of themselves, of their relationship rather than as information about what the technique was never designed to reach. That feeling of failure is very difficult to contend with, leaving the couple with a deep sense of brokenness.


What tends to be more useful is slower and less symptom-focused: tracking the pattern itself rather than adjudicating each incident. Whose withdrawal is this, historically? Whose criticism? What does each partner's nervous system do the moment before the fight actually starts — the look, the pause, the shift in posture that precedes the words? Often neither partner can initially answer this. Naming it as something with a history, rather than something that simply happens to them, is often the first real shift — not because insight alone resolves anything, but because it changes what the couple is fighting about. They stop litigating the dishes and start looking, together, at the thing the dishes keep standing in for, what is underneath.


None of this makes the fights stop overnight, and I'd be skeptical of anyone who tells you otherwise. What it tends to do is slow the couple down enough to ask a different question in the moment — not "who's right about this," but "what is this actually about, and whose old story just walked into the room."  Or “Do I have difficulty tolerating that my partner has a difference of opinion than me, am I unable to tolerate them as being a separate being” That question doesn't resolve in a single session. It's the kind of question that needs sustained, unhurried attention — which is a different offer than most short-term, symptom-focused couples work is equipped to address.


Are you looking for support navigating conflict as a couple?

The first step is to complete our intake form so we can match you with the right therapist. After we review your information, your therapist will reach out to arrange a 20‑minute consultation.



Taking care of your mental health is a courageous and important step towards overall well-being. We're here to support you on your journey to a happier, healthier life.


Read More:



If you are experiencing physical, emotional, financial or sexual abuse in your relationship, traditional couples therapy is inappropriate for you. A basic sense of safety is a human right and a fundamental requirement for couples therapy to be beneficial. If you or someone you know is in an abusive relationship, call the

Victim 24/7 Support Line: 1-888-579-2888;

Assaulted Women's Helpline: 1-866-863-0511 (toll-free, 24/7, multilingual service available)

National Domestic Violence Hotline www.thehotline.org 

Comments


bottom of page